Mark Platts is mostly concerned with defending moral realism from various objections, but he also endorses a specific form of moral realism, intuitionism, in order to make his defense of moral realism more specific. He makes it clear that he is interested in a form of moral realism in which moral facts are not reducible to nonmoral facts (283). He agrees that moral facts supervene (are dependent on) on nonmoral facts, but moral facts do not merely consist in the nonmoral facts (283). He lists three main aspects of intuitionism: First, intuitionism makes it clear that moral facts are not reducible to nonmoral facts. Two, intuitionism is compatible with a moral realist use of language. Three, intuitionism can admit that genuine moral dilemmas are possible. (more…)
August 25, 2009
Chapter 3.12 “Moral Reality” by Mark Platts
Filed under: epistemology,ethics,metaethics,philosophy,review — JW Gray @ 8:25 am
Tags: argument, critique, evidence, evil, good, goodness, intuitionism, justification, morality, objections
Tags: argument, critique, evidence, evil, good, goodness, intuitionism, justification, morality, objections